Gears of War 2's 'Seriously 2.0' Achievement Information [UPDATE] Written Thursday, August 21, 2008 by Jason Debelyak Update: We got word that there was a bit of confusion on what kills will count towards the Seriously 2.0 achievement. Apparently, every single kill that is gotten in ANY game mode will count, whether it be campaign, co-op, or multiplayer (either ranked or player). So no matter what you're playing, the kills will count, and you'll even have a kill tracker so you can keep track of how many kills you've gotten so far. Thank God it was a misunderstanding, because 100,000 kills strictly through campaign could get tiresome, so it's good to know you can get kills however you want to now. Choice is always good. Certainly one of the most sought after questions concerning Gears of War 2 for any achievement junky is the incorporation of another Seriously achievement. Well, revealed by Cliff Bleszinski today at the Canadian X08 event, there will be a second Seriously achievement to hit Gears of War 2. Dubbed "Seriously 2.0", it will require players to get 100,000 kills as opposed to the 10,000 kills in the first installment. Yes, you read that correctly, 100,000 kills. However, all kills from single player and co-op campaigns will count, presumably kills from the new Horde mode as well. However, apparently, kills gotten in multiplayer will not count. Definitely one of the most disappointing things I've heard about Gears of War 2, as I was extremely excited for another multiplayer seriously. Hopefully they'll reconsider it, or atleast include one for campaign and one for multiplayer. We'll find out in the coming months, as Gears of War 2 nears it's release date of November 7th. [via Xbox360Fanboy] | |
Login
Site Navigation
X360A
Achievements
Content
Community
Syndicate
x360a Main Feed
x360a News Feed
Gears of War 2's 'Seriously 2.0' Achievement Information [UPDATE]
User Comments
 | Comment #1 by mksystem74 Thursday, August 21, 2008 @ 08:25:44 PM YAY |
 | Comment #2 by Bondfan626 Thursday, August 21, 2008 @ 08:26:21 PM wtf! 100k is insane! Then again, you can actually fight locust armies in the single player. |
 | Comment #3 by Z Force Clemson Thursday, August 21, 2008 @ 08:26:22 PM Achievements should never be multiplayer-only. You should be able to get the full 1000 without having to waste time with obnoxious little kids online or trying to team up with a buddy in games that no one plays online anymore. |
 | Comment #4 by TheColdWolf Thursday, August 21, 2008 @ 08:26:35 PM I hope they have one for multiplayer other wise for me its going to be a short game and won't be coming back to it for a while |
 | Comment #5 by misco1 Thursday, August 21, 2008 @ 08:27:45 PM holy crap |
 | Comment #6 by Otisbum Thursday, August 21, 2008 @ 08:29:07 PM Much more incentive to get this game for the campaign. Nice move on Epic's part. Hopefully we can expect to get around 10k per playthrough on the harder difficulties though. |
 | Comment #7 by ShadowHero10 Thursday, August 21, 2008 @ 08:29:15 PM Aw man i was hoping they would have this 100k be for your ENtire gears career. But i guess ppl with no lives would go in player matches and boost so... whaddaya gonna do? |
 | Comment #8 by Raesvelgr Thursday, August 21, 2008 @ 08:30:09 PM Friggin Sweet |
 | Comment #9 by darkandlong Thursday, August 21, 2008 @ 08:30:57 PM Yeah, online achievements stink basically because getting them ruins the experience for everyone. People focus on the achievements and then you never get a good, solid fun game going. |
 | Comment #10 by narcolepticshee Thursday, August 21, 2008 @ 08:31:12 PM I agree with number 3, Achievements should NOT be multiplayer! Peace |
 | Comment #11 by thelob24 Thursday, August 21, 2008 @ 08:31:26 PM there dam well better be one for multiplayer thats fo sho |
 | Comment #12 by mrhobo Thursday, August 21, 2008 @ 08:31:42 PM i like this. i loved gears sp over mp |
 | Comment #13 by laundryman Thursday, August 21, 2008 @ 08:34:47 PM Well, with Horde it will be easier...still ball-busting hard and time consuming...but easier if it counts all modes. |
 | Comment #14 by DeadOnArrival06 Thursday, August 21, 2008 @ 08:36:50 PM Agreed also with #3. I guess a campaign 100,000 kills isnt that bad. Especially is you play through multiple Difficulties like I did With Gears 1. I can't wait for this game! |
 | Comment #15 by Akash Salam UMM Thursday, August 21, 2008 @ 08:41:37 PM Will Gears of War 3 then have 1,000,000 kills achievement, which would count for all of the modes? Seriously 3.0....Anyway, people will probably play horde mode a lot on the easiest maps to rack up those kills, just like terrorist hunt in LVU Campus and Villa for Rainbow Six Vegas 1 and 2. Fun nonetheless! Can't wait! |
 | Comment #16 by BravoBradshaw Thursday, August 21, 2008 @ 08:43:11 PM still guys think about it even though you can do it in singleplayer in what game have you ever got 100000 kills in!!!!!!!seriously lol!!! |
| Comment #17 by Brandon Sawyer Thursday, August 21, 2008 @ 08:43:31 PM ye i agree with you on the multiplayer cheating noobs but i love a bit of online achievements but boosters shud die lol but 100k kills so much better if it included online kills aswell but i suppose campaign hores will have this in no time |
 | Comment #18 by mashmonster Thursday, August 21, 2008 @ 08:44:55 PM If they go through with this, it will be the worst possible thing they could do to this game. Say for example that the campaign has 500 enemies in it that are killable. If you kill every one of those enemies in a single playthrough (unlikely), it will take you 200 PLAYTHROUGHS TO GET IT. If they don't include multiplayer into this, it will take FOREVER to get this. And Horde doesn't make any difference either. That probably has even less enemies to kill. In short: STUPID IDEA! |
 | Comment #19 by rise against 01 Thursday, August 21, 2008 @ 08:45:44 PM well there are spawing gametypes now |
 | Comment #20 by WhAtThEaPpLeSaUcE17 Thursday, August 21, 2008 @ 08:52:38 PM godddddddddddddd 100k eazzziii |
 | Comment #21 by Skillet Thursday, August 21, 2008 @ 08:53:25 PM YAY! Here's to hoping all of the achievements are available offline. Or at least online and offline like the EXP in Rainbow Six Vegas: 2. I hate fighting online for achievements. Some people can't play online 24/7. |
 | Comment #22 by Bax x360a Thursday, August 21, 2008 @ 08:53:47 PM 100k :O! I can't wait to own all those locust in Hoarde! :D |
 | Comment #23 by FailedSeppuku Thursday, August 21, 2008 @ 08:55:53 PM I thought the multiplayer was dissapointing, games should be like CoD 4. Offline achievements. Online fun. |
| Comment #24 by MonoNoob Thursday, August 21, 2008 @ 08:58:23 PM they better start looking for spawn glitches in the single player now then |
 | Comment #25 by YoungFate Thursday, August 21, 2008 @ 09:03:52 PM Sorry but this alone is about to make me cancel my pre-order No online Multi-Player Seriously? What is there to work for then? |
 | Comment #26 by eXiled Killah Thursday, August 21, 2008 @ 09:06:39 PM I'll echo #3 and #10. thank you very much. I've just about given up on online play.... |
 | Comment #27 by lid Thursday, August 21, 2008 @ 09:08:58 PM Thats Awesome! If you're reading this epic, dont change it! I'm tired of dealing with the horrendous community Gears has just to get some kills. |
 | Comment #28 by KingGotenW Thursday, August 21, 2008 @ 09:12:04 PM It is REALLY stupid to not include online in the 100k. They are making a HUGE mistake if they don't fix that... but i'm sure thousands of ppl will buy it regardless. (I know i am) |
 | Comment #29 by Elite Wombat Thursday, August 21, 2008 @ 09:15:46 PM It would have been nice for every kill, online or not, to count, but we all know that this translates to a final level where a bomb is dropped on a horde of 75,000 Locust. After all, GoW2 is all about bigger groups of enemies.... |
 | Comment #30 by SCA KAZUMA Thursday, August 21, 2008 @ 09:16:29 PM I don't get why it's that big a deal. I think it's a good idea. Like #23 said, online should be strictly for fun and offline should be for achievements. Many people, like myself, get tired of having to work towards achievements, because it takes the fun out of the game because you're not playing leisurely; you're playing to get the achievement. What does it matter whether or not the achievement doesn't count multiplayer? That's not going to take away the enjoyment the mp will bring. That's a partial reason why CoD4's online was so successful. There were no little kids boosting the game for achievements. It was all people who wanted to play for no other reason than to play for fun. WTG, E.P.I.C. This is the best idea you've had as far as achieves go. Just please - no more 100 matches |
 | Comment #31 by cortex21 Thursday, August 21, 2008 @ 09:21:55 PM People shouldn't complain about online achievements, they are good as long as they aren't ridiculously stupid like kill 1,000,000 different players online, they are part of the game to make the game worthwhile, it's a form of marketing strategy, not everyone buys the game for singleplayer, some people actually bought cod 4 just for multiplayer purposes but shame for them that they don't have online achievements, they should be mixed, this achievement is just another way of making the game longer for those who care about doing it. You don't want to do it, fine just don't complain |
 | Comment #32 by RRIKER Thursday, August 21, 2008 @ 09:23:54 PM so it's undertow's "Lord of the deep" times 10 minus multiplayer kills... wait, does this allude to weapon kills counting in campaign? |
 | Comment #33 by xgonscm2 Thursday, August 21, 2008 @ 09:24:09 PM wow, good luck |
| Comment #34 by SCA KAZUMA Thursday, August 21, 2008 @ 09:26:00 PM with 3+ rounds in a gametype virtually no one plays. |
| Comment #35 by adamr999 Thursday, August 21, 2008 @ 09:26:25 PM if u dont buy a game because of 1 achievement you would be extremely sad. |
| Comment #36 by YoungFate Thursday, August 21, 2008 @ 09:26:51 PM I play gears for the Multi player For all you homos that want single player achivments...Get the fuck out Gears = Multiplayer Genius |
 | Comment #37 by killerharu45 Thursday, August 21, 2008 @ 09:31:22 PM Thats horrible. Are they retarded |
 | Comment #38 by Zombii300 Thursday, August 21, 2008 @ 09:31:56 PM Cliff Bleszinski I despise you. |
 | Comment #39 by Edable Giraffe Thursday, August 21, 2008 @ 09:33:21 PM great, i hated seriously... whats the point in rediculous achievements like that? horde mode looks fun but im sure this will be a bitch to get |
 | Comment #40 by Lord of Orion Thursday, August 21, 2008 @ 09:38:33 PM This is just going to make everything more obtainable for people ... just wait for the 1,000 kills with the Lancer, 1,000 kills with the Shotgun, 1,000 kills with the Longshot, 1,000 kills with the Boomshot, etc. Those achievements would be sick to try and get. We shall see if it happens. |
 | Comment #41 by My BR Is Evil Thursday, August 21, 2008 @ 09:42:18 PM I to must agree with the debate to make online achievements, some are not bad as they go hand in hand with daily playing online but some are rediculous. Take note to NBA Ballers online achievements for a game that no one ever plays online. |
 | Comment #42 by knockton55 Thursday, August 21, 2008 @ 09:47:23 PM Ahhhhh good, 100,000 kills online would be ridicilous |
 | Comment #43 by Medaking Thursday, August 21, 2008 @ 09:54:00 PM 1000G this for sure or 1250 whatever comes first. I do expect an avatar shirt or something for this |
| Comment #44 by trevor2p Thursday, August 21, 2008 @ 09:57:17 PM 100,000? thats it? im dissapointed in you epic, i thought you could make it more like 1,000,000. |
 | Comment #45 by lepricorn Thursday, August 21, 2008 @ 09:59:22 PM count me in for the 1000g club and 1250 club |
 | Comment #46 by litepink Thursday, August 21, 2008 @ 10:01:38 PM From an IGN article, regarding the "Horde" mode. "The first (wave) was obviously an introduction with fewer than ten enemies challenging my team but that number grew quickly as we progressed. " #18 mashmonster...it sounds like Horde DOES matter, and it may not take FOREVER. Horde is describes as waves of enemies. But who knows, the game isn't out yet. In short: The games not out yet, simmer down. |
 | Comment #47 by hoochie mama 88 Thursday, August 21, 2008 @ 10:01:56 PM This has to be single player and multiplayer combined. There's no way Epic can expect us to play the campaign 20 times and get 5,000 kills each time. |
 | Comment #48 by Dog Of Thunder Thursday, August 21, 2008 @ 10:06:52 PM I'd like to thank comment #36 for illustrating why single player achievements are a great inclusion. 100,000 kills simply means the Horde co-op mode will be popular. |
 | Comment #49 by kiwi18 Thursday, August 21, 2008 @ 10:09:08 PM Jesus Christ are you kidding me? |
| Comment #50 by xGoufx Thursday, August 21, 2008 @ 10:12:27 PM WTF !!!!!!! thats just way too much even if you are a die hard. Watch its worth 25 or 30 points. |
| Comment #51 by cortex21 Thursday, August 21, 2008 @ 10:15:49 PM on a lighter note after my last comment yeah it would be so funny if this achievement was worth 5g lol |
| Comment #52 by rick9099 Thursday, August 21, 2008 @ 10:34:55 PM You do have to take into consideration that there would be moments in campaign that are like the spot that was in the e3 demo *where they put the turrent out of the window* but, i dont think there will be alot of the moments in the campaign although people will probably be restarting it over and over at that moment just to get alot of kills fast. P.S.Im actually looking foward to unlocking this one. |
 | Comment #53 by Nevander Thursday, August 21, 2008 @ 10:35:34 PM Lol 100k that should be fun, let's hope it doesn't get glitched again. OH NOES! It unlocks at 200k! D: |
 | Comment #54 by YanksForTheWin Thursday, August 21, 2008 @ 10:39:34 PM Wow wow wow... what is up with all the bitching because this achievement isn't online? Wake up people. Some of you are actually stating that now there is nothing to accomplish online. It seems that some of you have taken this achievement whoring way too seriously... (no pun intended) Gears online is suppose to be fun, not a grind/race for a achievement. Hell, all games are suppose to be fun first, achievement whore second. Call of Duty 4 had no online achievements yet offered a challenging 1000. (I still have nightmares of Mile High Club) CoD4 was also fun as heck online, or for the majority of us anyway. Instead about bitching about this not being online, we should pray that it doesn't take 100,000+ kills to actually unlock it like the current "Seriously..." (10,000+) If so.. then |
 | Comment #55 by silentbob0 Thursday, August 21, 2008 @ 10:49:56 PM Epic make bull**** achievements if you think this new seriously achievement is bad, look at the Unreal Tournament 3 achievements, most of the multiplayer achievements can only be achieved by boosting. I am expecting another terrible achievement list for this game. |
 | Comment #56 by Atarii Thursday, August 21, 2008 @ 10:51:44 PM 100,000? :( |
 | Comment #57 by Poisonheadcrab Thursday, August 21, 2008 @ 10:53:11 PM Seriously doesn't apply to Multiplayer? Ok, I'm fine with that...I don't see any reason to complain seeing as it will actually be much easier (more kills through campaign/minute versus multiplayer). |
| Comment #58 by isael101 Thursday, August 21, 2008 @ 10:53:40 PM "Achievements should never be multiplayer-only. You should be able to get the full 1000 without having to waste time with obnoxious little kids online or trying to team up with a buddy in games that no one plays online anymore." lol true and its not fair for the people who do not have access to xbox live. |
 | Comment #59 by daddy exec Thursday, August 21, 2008 @ 10:56:28 PM I am sure there will be other achievements that will keep multi players busy. Cliff said, there will be better achievement tracking this time around and that suggests alot. |
 | Comment #60 by Perxxxxx Thursday, August 21, 2008 @ 10:58:16 PM 'Seriously' what the hell?! This better be a joke because if you cant work on it whilst playing online it just takes some of the fun away, you wont have an urge to do well every time you play to edge a little bit closer and there will be no eagerly anticipated 'achievement unlocked' at the end of the long road , instead youe gotta play through the story 100 times , yeh .... thats gonna be fun ...... |
 | Comment #61 by m-iichel Thursday, August 21, 2008 @ 11:01:36 PM yeeeeaaaahhhh nice !!!!:D im still working on seriously 1 on gow:P nut 100k in single isnt that bad at least you gte more kills when playing ... in gow mp you get 4max a round:S then it takes for ever:S that sucks.. so cant wait to kill 100k locust in gow2 sp:D:P |
 | Comment #62 by hispanicplaya Thursday, August 21, 2008 @ 11:05:48 PM i think this is a good idea...=] so u can't really boost |
 | Comment #63 by gumppy12 Thursday, August 21, 2008 @ 11:06:53 PM 100,000 kills shouldn't be to hard since they are saying that they can have more than 100 enemies on screen at one time. I agree that the achievments should not only be online. I think that they should figure out a way to have them be both online and offline. Like Gears of War's Seriously could've had 10,000 online or 20,000 offline and you could choose which one to go after, or someting like that. So people like me that don't have to many friends with 360's or just don't have Xbox Live can earn all of them. And also people that would prefer to play online can still earn them too. That way however you want to play you can still earn all 1000GS. I've been thinking about starting a petition to send to Microsoft to have it mandatory so that all achievments can be earned either way. Let me kn |
 | Comment #64 by DarkPyroGuy_09 Thursday, August 21, 2008 @ 11:07:23 PM I am liking this. |
 | Comment #65 by alex4283 Thursday, August 21, 2008 @ 11:08:53 PM I don't have any complaints about this since they are including multi and solo play. Good call. |
 | Comment #66 by carnage_06 Thursday, August 21, 2008 @ 11:10:54 PM Yeah i'm glad that this seriously 2.0 isn't multiplayer based i never got into the multiplayer on original GoW. Hosts kept leaving, little whiny kids and just annoyed me to no end. |
 | Comment #67 by chueychu216 Thursday, August 21, 2008 @ 11:13:30 PM I dont know about this, I hope they reconsider it. |
 | Comment #68 by MegaSparten360 Thursday, August 21, 2008 @ 11:17:50 PM i think this is going to be awesome i dont see y ur all complaining so much. the campaign will be much easier 4 100,000 kills. an di really doubt there is only like 5,000 in the campaign they cant expect someone to play the campaign 20 time considering they kill every single enemy |
 | Comment #69 by Infomouse Thursday, August 21, 2008 @ 11:27:50 PM Well if this dosn't change, no gears 2 4 me :( |
 | Comment #70 by jond Thursday, August 21, 2008 @ 11:27:50 PM i agree with number #3. achievements should not be based on the multiplayer but the main game. they need to do what Call of Duty 4 did and just make unlockables and challenges. all the call of duty 4 achievements are based on single player. its just my opinion.. |
| Comment #71 by VVvaibhavVV Thursday, August 21, 2008 @ 11:36:55 PM Seriously E.P.I.C., WTF? This might be the biggest dick move in gaming. This is probably a joke achievement just to see who has the balls/lack of life to try this shit. Only way that this would work is if the enemies are endlessly respawning (like CoD4) till you push forward. Also, have to agree with #3, #23, n everyone else that online achievements are bullskite; Call of Duty 4 has no online achievables and is my favorite game while Halo 3 has online Achiev's and is complete bullshit. Guys online is for fun, not for points. Seriously, I say Infinity Ward is possibly the smartest developers cause they dont put in bullshit achiev's just for dicks to go and boost for them. If you actually resort to boosting in a game, are you really having fun? It becomes more of a chore, and I know from exp |
| Comment #72 by Medaking Thursday, August 21, 2008 @ 11:48:17 PM Echoing a comment from earlier not getting for an achievement is plain dumb for example I got GH III for my Wii cause of dodgy achievements. Big mistake, so dont be a tit Infomouse. |
 | Comment #73 by HybridPK Thursday, August 21, 2008 @ 11:50:12 PM Well, I'm glad to see that Epic hasn't forgotten about those who prefer campaigns over online multiplayer. Now, where's the 4 player co-op campaign? Horde mode isn't satisfying enough. |
 | Comment #74 by TyrantJester Thursday, August 21, 2008 @ 11:50:59 PM R6 Vegas 2 had it right when they allowed you to gain XP in both single and multiplayer. Allowing you to gain levels and achievements whichever way you prefer. That is an ideal way to do it. |
 | Comment #75 by Octobox Thursday, August 21, 2008 @ 11:53:47 PM at least now i should 1000 it :D |
| Comment #76 by Medaking Thursday, August 21, 2008 @ 11:55:58 PM Speaking of plain dumb I missed out the 'get the game' part. Hey its late :P |
| Comment #77 by Heron T Beagle Friday, August 22, 2008 @ 12:03:39 AM people are so funny boosters should die blah blah blha....lmao over half this site is people who boost whenever they can to get achievements. |
 | Comment #78 by Nick Is I Friday, August 22, 2008 @ 12:13:35 AM Post #3 said it all. i look forward to giving my life to GoW2. |
 | Comment #79 by darquesyde Friday, August 22, 2008 @ 12:35:23 AM Well this is only one achievement revealed. There are another 49 (or 98) to go... But maybe they are trying to up the ante with the co-op mode by doing this. |
 | Comment #80 by Bloody Sky Friday, August 22, 2008 @ 12:38:36 AM I don't have a problem if people want to achievement whore. If that is what you want to waste your time on, go for it. But simply NOT buying a game, no matter how fun it might be, because you don't like 1 (or any for that matter) achievement is the silliest thing I have ever heard. Anyways, sounds like an achievement I will be surprised to get if I just play it casually when I feel like playing. I might end up getting it after about a year of having the game, never know. Also, I agree along side #3, and #54 said a lot of things I wanted to say. |
 | Comment #81 by Halochief Chris Friday, August 22, 2008 @ 12:40:10 AM Oh joy! Getting 10k kills wasn't fun enough, now they made it 100k. And it's all campaign and not multiplayer too. |
 | Comment #82 by undyingone Friday, August 22, 2008 @ 12:51:28 AM hopefully theres one for multiplayer as well |
 | Comment #83 by AlCapwneXT Friday, August 22, 2008 @ 12:59:09 AM Games should have multi conditional achievements to unlock. Either do (insert offline task) OR (insert online task). And depending on how it is unlocked, the color of the achievement in the list can be one of two colors or something. If done both ways, a third color is displayed to show a person's 'hardcore' dedication. This would make everyone happy I'd think. As for 100k, that's just there as a shock factor. I bet it'll be reasonable with the whole large scale combat thing they've got going. |
 | Comment #84 by RokBXx Friday, August 22, 2008 @ 12:59:52 AM ...Thus making this A LOT MORE FUN! |
 | Comment #85 by Fryza Friday, August 22, 2008 @ 01:11:53 AM Meh. |
 | Comment #86 by buck wyyld Friday, August 22, 2008 @ 01:16:38 AM @#83: Let's hope it's reasonable in just a few playthroughs, otherwise I'll just say fuck it to half of the achievements like I did with last game. I'd still say it's one of my 10 all-time favorites, but some games have enjoyable points and some don't; guess I'll play the ones that are fun. Fuck it, already won a GSl, anyway:) Here's to killing a shitload of locusts (let's hope 20,000 per campaign!) |
 | Comment #87 by chiefgonebad Friday, August 22, 2008 @ 01:35:45 AM whys everyone complaining so much? like seriously they make single player and multiplayer achievements so that those who dont have live or dont enjoy the multiplayer can get points. i see this as a way of giving gamers who didnt have live and missed the oppertunity to work on seriously in GOW1 to be able to work on it in the second one. |
 | Comment #88 by voorhees88 Friday, August 22, 2008 @ 01:36:50 AM At least the campaign will have more replay value...a lot more i hope |
 | Comment #89 by Gariom Friday, August 22, 2008 @ 02:15:57 AM 100,000? You have GOT to be kidding me. |
| Comment #90 by silentbob0 Friday, August 22, 2008 @ 02:52:16 AM 100,000 is bullshit, I for one will not be sad enough to go for a pathetic achievement like this. |
 | Comment #91 by GameFreak47 Friday, August 22, 2008 @ 02:53:00 AM As much of a pain Seriously was to get, I enjoyed all the time I put in to get it. If they don't have a multiplayer version of Seriously, I will be disappointed. |
 | Comment #92 by X JOHNSON 4 Friday, August 22, 2008 @ 02:54:35 AM I think this was a better idea,but they should have included multiplayer kills in with it, but 100,000exclusive to mutiplayer would be rediculous so i guess the campaign kills counting was a good move. |
| Comment #93 by GamingColt Friday, August 22, 2008 @ 02:59:27 AM WOOT. ALL OF U ARE GONNA HAVE RED EYES!! |
 | Comment #94 by PlanetGalida Friday, August 22, 2008 @ 03:26:30 AM Comment #3 is pretty much gospel to me. Could not have put it better. It's so nauseating to try to get on there with the snot-nosed kids and get multiplayer achievements in spite of them. |
 | Comment #95 by SENTACOLIS Friday, August 22, 2008 @ 03:39:36 AM pooped a little |
| Comment #96 by WhAtThEaPpLeSaUcE17 Friday, August 22, 2008 @ 04:01:54 AM they named 1 fricken achievement and ur all spazzin out pathetic. |
 | Comment #97 by ROA5T BeeF Friday, August 22, 2008 @ 04:31:52 AM 100,000...and its only in single player? Thats worse than Mass Effect making you replay it 3 times almost to 100% to get some acheivements... Include multiplayer. Seriously was one of the only reasons i kept playing Gears 1 online. What would make them think that we can posssibly get THAT much enjoyment out of single player modes? |
 | Comment #98 by Dov Friday, August 22, 2008 @ 05:08:28 AM Fuck multiplayer-only achievements and the boosting achievement whores who love them. Glad this is campaign and co-op only. |
 | Comment #99 by JRAPOCALYPSE Friday, August 22, 2008 @ 05:15:17 AM GOW is overated! this will be gow 1.5 not a true sequal and if the mp is as bad as 1 i'll puke!! although i did like the campaign in the first game but thats not enough.I bet 2 will be worse with glitches,just goes to show bad programming (lol) in the end just more repetative crap.If the game had no chainsaw bayonette it would have done nothing,quite sad a game gets popularity over 1 stupid thing when there are far superior games out there....how pathetic!! |
 | Comment #100 by Akatsuki Sw1tch Friday, August 22, 2008 @ 05:16:51 AM Yes nice one considering the multiplayer was a complete shit in gears 1 |
| Comment #101 by JRAPOCALYPSE Friday, August 22, 2008 @ 05:19:36 AM Online achievements suck anyways as most people glitch to get them so whats the point! Has gaming gotten that lame? |
 | Comment #102 by A Satyr Friday, August 22, 2008 @ 06:04:43 AM Seriously was the only achievement i ever said im glad i earned that. Now it means nothing... |
 | Comment #103 by ezekiel 08 Friday, August 22, 2008 @ 06:20:12 AM It should be the total single and multiplayer kills. Then if you don't like playing online (or don't have XBL for that matter, there are plenty of people without it), you can just farm kills offline. I wonder if the kill from Campaign co-op will count... |
 | Comment #104 by rockhopper Friday, August 22, 2008 @ 06:29:08 AM seriously people, stop complaining. Campaign this time will have tons more enemies than the first one. Horde mode has 50 waves of tons of enemies. If you can get this achievement in horde mode, you have nothing to worry about. It will be a challenge to anyone just replaying horde over and over to get to wave 50. Epic testers can't even get past wave 26! And they will have mulitplayer achievements to work towards as well. That's where the whole limiting the number of kills that count comes in. Even if you could earn seriously in mp, they said that only 1 or 2 kills would count per round. |
 | Comment #105 by B1ue Smoke Friday, August 22, 2008 @ 06:31:35 AM I think it's a good move to have single player achievements only because all my friends that play lots and lots multiplayer don't even care about achievements anyway. Achievements should be made for the people who actually want to go for them. Not people who play online all the time and couldn't care less if there is a achievement or not. |
 | Comment #106 by keza132 Friday, August 22, 2008 @ 07:22:59 AM Wow 100,000 kills should be fun XD |
| Comment #107 by Medaking Friday, August 22, 2008 @ 08:45:56 AM Wow 106 comments even if it is largely two sides to the same argvment |
 | Comment #108 by b3nnyth3gr33k Friday, August 22, 2008 @ 09:33:39 AM wtf thats madness |
| Comment #109 by Captain Digger Friday, August 22, 2008 @ 09:36:18 AM damn that fucking crazy man im stil getting seriously for 10, 000 kills and im only at 8,800.... now there making it 100,000!!!! grr at least its thorughout campaign and stuff so hopefully they got alot of enemies in it but they better make it so that u get the achievement right on 100,000 unlike gears 1 cuz thats retarded |
 | Comment #110 by CaptainKicker Friday, August 22, 2008 @ 09:44:01 AM All acheviements should be in multiplayer. Im one of the people who hates SP in Gears of War, and ill never play it, in the 2.. Come on Epic. Make some GOOD online achievements |
 | Comment #111 by Nuclearbiscuit Friday, August 22, 2008 @ 10:32:48 AM I think its good that Epic haven't just released another multi-player seriously. They've actually taken time to think about it and make it different. 100K kills should be fun, because i am sure the campaign will be great as will "horde" mode. Also since there will be less influence on multi-player maybe less quitters? we can only wait and see. |
 | Comment #112 by Frankie B1 Friday, August 22, 2008 @ 10:41:50 AM Yaaaaay about time we had some proper progressive achievements in games, I mean where was the drunk driver achievement in GTA 4 (knocked over 10,000 lamposts) lets hope thats in Saints Row 2 but yeah well gald about this cheevo :D:D |
 | Comment #113 by dragonboyandy Friday, August 22, 2008 @ 10:43:56 AM Does it honestly matter if the achievement isn't for multiplayer? It's still going to be an awesome game. The single player game looks incredible and the multiplayer looks even better than the original. This is going to be a fantastic title, and would be just as good if it came with no achievements whatsoever. |
 | Comment #114 by Raider Friday, August 22, 2008 @ 10:55:48 AM A lot of people are gonna be pissed off about this. |
 | Comment #115 by VeNGeD Friday, August 22, 2008 @ 11:05:47 AM I really hope multi player counts... |
 | Comment #116 by NiceCheese Friday, August 22, 2008 @ 11:13:33 AM sounds better having it for single player, lets just hope that it isnt glitched like the first achievement whereby people got over 10,000 kills and still didnt get the achievement... |
 | Comment #117 by Fafner Friday, August 22, 2008 @ 11:15:41 AM sweet.... |
 | Comment #118 by blackflame0729 Friday, August 22, 2008 @ 11:16:59 AM Single Player? Im fine with that |
| Comment #119 by halopimp21 Friday, August 22, 2008 @ 11:26:45 AM well...i know some ppl that are close to 100k already so it seems this one will take a couple years lol |
 | Comment #120 by cOmESeEMycAgE Friday, August 22, 2008 @ 11:31:20 AM This is good news. Gears multiplayer wasn't good/fun enough to warrant an achievement like Seriously. Good to see Epic wised up. |
 | Comment #121 by Grimz94 Friday, August 22, 2008 @ 12:09:02 PM couldnt get 1000 kills, who the hell do the think i am, Marcus Fenix? |
 | Comment #122 by Reaper_Grim Friday, August 22, 2008 @ 01:17:32 PM Personally i think a move like this by Epic will make the replay value of this game even better for achievement whores like us. Bring it on!!! |
| Comment #123 by YoungFate Friday, August 22, 2008 @ 01:21:01 PM The only people who don't want online gears achievments are the little Halo and CoD Queers They can't get the Gears achievments because they suck so much I found GoW to be an easy 1250/1250 without boosting or glitching |
 | Comment #124 by Thrall320 Friday, August 22, 2008 @ 01:32:13 PM This isn't disapointing at all. Pretty much all I play of Gears 1 is Campaign co-op, due to the Multiplayer was so repetitive. Though Gears 2... the Multiplayer is to be A LOT better. I'm happy with this choice though. |
 | Comment #125 by Jar_Of_Omens Friday, August 22, 2008 @ 01:59:57 PM I really hope there is one for online. It makes you feel like your actually working for something instead of just doing the same thing over and over again for nothing. |
 | Comment #126 by SYNNESTER R I P Friday, August 22, 2008 @ 02:23:07 PM Great idea remember the days we didn't have online play and we just played games for the love of it? I still remember them and something like this would have made it even better and I know people who still don't have xbox live. Gives them a chance of getting the acchievements as well. For those of you who are complaining you are probably the boosting types fed up of ending up in games with you. totaly ruins the xbox live experience and proves you can't actually play the game properly. We all know the type. COD4 1vs1 headshots so i can have blue tiger camo etc... get a life people. |
 | Comment #127 by Swogdor Friday, August 22, 2008 @ 02:35:20 PM Pffff. This is queer. 100,000 kills? I know people play GoW a lot, but 100k is WAY to much. But hey, at least when people unlock it we know their either korean or just a really, really, REALLY sad fuck. Good time for ripping really. ^^ |
 | Comment #128 by Andy0808 Friday, August 22, 2008 @ 02:48:25 PM YOUR IDIOTS, EVERYONE SAYING SADACTS WILL GET THIS ITS NOT MULTIPLAYER JUST SINGLE HAVE YOU SEEN THAT FIRST LEVEL THERES ABOUT 1000 JUST IN THAT LEVEL ALONE PROBABLY MORE YOUR THE FUCKING SADACTS FOR ASSUMING IT AND THIS PROBABLY WONT TAKE ASLONG AS SERIOUSLY CONSIDERING LOCUSTS ARE EASIER AND QUICKER TO KILL THAN AN ADDICT WIELDING A SHOTGUN OR LONGSHOT |
 | Comment #129 by GoWisfun Friday, August 22, 2008 @ 02:55:49 PM 100K Kills lol have fun achievement whores. #127 summed it up pretty well :D |
 | Comment #130 by Seany Show Friday, August 22, 2008 @ 03:23:06 PM would be better if it covered all kills in the game including SP/MP and CO-OP but will still give it a go.Just hope theirs a counter telling us how the achievement is going.Just had enough of quiters in the 1st Gears MP!!! |
 | Comment #131 by eXtremeWiso Friday, August 22, 2008 @ 04:23:55 PM Im really glad that this one is offline. I might not rush to get this achievement but I do plan on playing the campaign more than once and probably play lots of Horde. For me its almost impossible to get seriously as my connection always sucks (middle east). #27 This is exactly how all games should be. Although having a couple of skill requiring and not time consuming online achievements would be great (Halo 3). |
 | Comment #132 by Fruhmann360 Friday, August 22, 2008 @ 04:49:50 PM NO MORE 1K ONLINE ACHIEVEMENTS! keep the slavers off Live. and if there are online achievements, why make them ranked matches? just let slavers hook up with other slavers to get them. |
 | Comment #133 by stonedpimpdaddy Friday, August 22, 2008 @ 05:03:55 PM What?! multiplayer kills dont count! um i seriously hope they reconsider that because who wants to play campaign over and over again just to get that. 100k is insane! |
 | Comment #134 by Hooligunn Friday, August 22, 2008 @ 05:04:00 PM This is a misreport. It's campaign, co-op and multiplayer. There is an audio interview over at Joystiq where Cliff Blezinski confirms it. |
 | Comment #135 by Axe Argonian Friday, August 22, 2008 @ 05:15:07 PM This is a game that I don't look forward to 1000ing it. |
| Comment #136 by JC Friday, August 22, 2008 @ 05:29:45 PM That is lot of kills, hopefully there are tons of enemies per level! |
 | Comment #137 by soupertrooper Friday, August 22, 2008 @ 05:40:48 PM seriously 2.0 is a much easier achievement then it sounds |
 | Comment #138 by prezskroob Friday, August 22, 2008 @ 05:59:00 PM @ #3, you said it. Can we finally see the end of multiplayer achievements? |
 | Comment #139 by SpeedyWat Friday, August 22, 2008 @ 06:00:44 PM As #134 mentioned, this is a misreport. Cliff Blezinski does infact state at joystiq that this applies to the following; player matches, ranked matches, co-op campaign, single player campaign, and horde. Therefore, stop complaining. There is no reason why one should not purchase a game just because of one achievement that is out of his/her reach. |
 | Comment #140 by III Curtis III Friday, August 22, 2008 @ 06:13:41 PM #139 proof? |
| Comment #141 by SpeedyWat Friday, August 22, 2008 @ 06:30:56 PM Go to joystiq.com and scroll down to the gears section and listen to the audio of Cliff. He states information regarding Seriously 2.0. |
 | Comment #142 by xYx VeNoM xYx Friday, August 22, 2008 @ 06:47:45 PM This info is only half right thanks to the interviewers it can be done in multiplayer... read the updated article... http://www.xbox360fanboy.com/2008/08/21/x08-cliff-talks-gears-2s-seriously-2-0-achievement/ |
 | Comment #143 by Vapourise Friday, August 22, 2008 @ 07:25:34 PM oooh. that looks hard but u can to in single player and i garentee there will be a level wear you will killlike 500 people by blowing up a building or somthing |
 | Comment #144 by g2thecore Friday, August 22, 2008 @ 08:22:28 PM Hooray! I'm glad that it's singleplayer only actually. Now I'll have an incentive to play Horde and the singleplayer story more than once. I can't wait. Don't worry guys there are other MP achievements I'm sure. |
 | Comment #145 by ChaosGod87 Friday, August 22, 2008 @ 08:29:43 PM Im sure there gonna have a Seriously for the Multiplayer part of them game, no need in freaking out about it. |
 | Comment #146 by XxJ2XxX Friday, August 22, 2008 @ 08:49:05 PM 100,000 kills, i played Gears for 5 months already and still i havent gotten 10,000 kills, 100,000 kills will be hard to get |
 | Comment #147 by SteamingClown Friday, August 22, 2008 @ 08:53:31 PM I wish those people who gained the Original Seriously would stop complaining - it isn't in this game, like...cry me a river? If you guys adored that achievement so much, restrict yourself to ranked matches and get 100k in ranked matches alone - why do you guys care so much if other SANE gamers have a seriously achievement. Jeez. |
 | Comment #148 by RFT 123 Friday, August 22, 2008 @ 08:59:54 PM This one shouldn't be as glitched as the last one, because the single player kills count. But it will be glitched, it's kinda obvious. |
| Comment #149 by Akumario Friday, August 22, 2008 @ 09:12:47 PM hell yeah i got two copys on reservetion on gamestop for my 2 consoles i hate split the screen that is why .. can wait ! have u guys gonna get the star wars game this september ???? cuz i will |
 | Comment #150 by italianstallion Friday, August 22, 2008 @ 09:48:36 PM sweet ass achievement now. You can do whatever the hell you please. |
 | Comment #151 by MASTERCHEAT Friday, August 22, 2008 @ 10:10:19 PM The third "Gears of War" should be out as soon I complete that achievement. Ha-ha-ha! |
 | Comment #152 by II Devastate II Friday, August 22, 2008 @ 10:15:52 PM wtf this is stupid in my opinion i would of taken 20,000 kills in ranked match only than 100,000 in campaign coop whatever it is. I loved the multiplayer in gears of war 1 and it seems like its going to be under-looked now due to this achievement |
 | Comment #153 by HomicidalTripod Friday, August 22, 2008 @ 10:54:30 PM Boy you guy's are slow. It says its Multi and single payer now. What a bunch of idiots. Ughh. |
| Comment #154 by cortex21 Friday, August 22, 2008 @ 11:04:56 PM O thats much better that's it's counting in all types of modes, quicker to do if you play the game a lot which I know everyone will, so everyone can achieve this one. |
 | Comment #155 by barbour99 Saturday, August 23, 2008 @ 12:12:59 AM To get 100k kills you're gonna have to play a lot of multiplayer anyway without driving yourself mad doing the story over and over again... I'll likely play the story 2-3 and work towards the rest of the kills on multiplayer... I like that the kills can be picked up on the player matches too so that you can play with friends :) |
 | Comment #156 by OMGmyFACE Saturday, August 23, 2008 @ 12:36:41 AM I too join the rally for ending multiplayer achievements. No way am I getting 1000 in something that has online-only achievements because I just got on XBL Gold a week ago and boosting old games is ALREADY getting old. Hell, my first experience online consisted of learning new (and wow, messed up) insults and having 12 y/o british kids making fun of my gamertag whilst killing everyone on their own team. This is why I haven't even TRIED Gears online yet. |
 | Comment #157 by SuperGaz Saturday, August 23, 2008 @ 01:00:50 AM lol holy crap. i got seriously legit and that was a grind, this is going to be a bitch no matter what game modes count. Still, i relish a challenge. and at #156 welcome to the marvelous world of xbox live lmao. |
| Comment #158 by SuperGaz Saturday, August 23, 2008 @ 01:03:59 AM and at 152, are you insane. How is it goin to be underlooked gears 1 want even supposed to have a multiplayer, this one has more than 5 different modes twice as many charcters to choose and new weapons.....ye its been under-looked : |
| Comment #159 by touchmynoodle55 Saturday, August 23, 2008 @ 01:13:41 AM Good now everyone will stop bitching about it. |
| Comment #160 by Mexiqant Saturday, August 23, 2008 @ 02:18:50 AM If your not going to get a game because u cant get some stupid achievement then u are the saddist fuck i have ever seen, seriously get a life. And any one gay enough to bitch about how they cant get achievements because they dont have live, you are really gay, y do u even bother getting achievements? personal satisfaction? ur gay and these gays bitching about boosters, the only reason ur on this site is to find easy ways to get achievements boosting or not. And anyone gay enough to actually not get live and just play single player games all day has no life. And im sure they are still gonna put some achievements accessible on multi player like weapon achievements or game mode achievements so everyone just stop bitching. |
 | Comment #161 by itsmatt338 Saturday, August 23, 2008 @ 02:21:06 AM i think in gears two you should be able o join a prty with your friends |
| Comment #162 by chueychu216 Saturday, August 23, 2008 @ 03:33:51 AM Oh yeah, I'm glad both count, but 100k is alot! This achievement will separate the men from boys or ladies from girls (for all you gamerchicks out there). |
| Comment #163 by NoVa x v3 Saturday, August 23, 2008 @ 04:05:49 AM well i think they should have the 100,000 for all game modes and then also have just the regular 10,000 in multiplayr again |
 | Comment #164 by braddelo Saturday, August 23, 2008 @ 04:49:56 AM @25 What is there to work for??? It's about fun. People worried about stats are fucking idiots. At least it was updated saying you can get them in multiplayer. |
 | Comment #165 by ladder49 Saturday, August 23, 2008 @ 08:02:25 AM wtf how the heck are you supposed to get 100k kills. i cant even gets 10k kills. |
| Comment #166 by JC Saturday, August 23, 2008 @ 09:25:36 AM Phew! |
 | Comment #167 by xHHx CURT xHHx Saturday, August 23, 2008 @ 10:00:34 AM i agree with this achievement being obtained offline, but it MUST b obtainable online 2... U cn play 4 fun with or without going for this achievement. I dont think that EPIC r dumb enough to make a 100 000 kil achievement, wivout makin it online azwel as off... |
 | Comment #168 by MasonW94 Saturday, August 23, 2008 @ 10:16:31 AM i have 173k kills on cod4 online :/ so this shouldnt be too hard if its single player aswell |
 | Comment #169 by hellboundsoul Saturday, August 23, 2008 @ 10:24:38 AM You know they just did this to see how many of us would actually get it. But, if you play the game enough, (which everyone will), it shouldn't be too much of a problem. I'm glad that the single player modes count towards the 100k. |
 | Comment #170 by Whiffy chedder Saturday, August 23, 2008 @ 11:29:42 AM what an awful idea the seriously achievement has kept me playing it for so long who really wants to play single player and the wave thing till they get 100 k kills? I agree with some of the points but lets face it gow 2 mutiplayer is not really going to die out. It's not like 'The club' or 'blacksite'. The real gow fans are going to be gutted. It should be the same as the last one! |
 | Comment #171 by cool4joe Saturday, August 23, 2008 @ 12:56:01 PM I'm glad they did this. I usually play through the campaign for each difficulty by myself and then again with some friends, so with those and horde mode I should be close by the time I get on multiplayer (I hope) and I like player matches over ranked. |
 | Comment #172 by ThrawnOmega Saturday, August 23, 2008 @ 02:14:31 PM 80+ thousand of those kills for me will be in horde mode. |
| Comment #173 by sparrowsp Saturday, August 23, 2008 @ 02:33:10 PM I think MP achievemnts should be included but without having to play only ranked matches. If EPIC allows playing on player matches, of course, there will still be ppl meeting up just for the achievements but I´m F***ng sure most of the players will play for fun ad still get the achievements! |
 | Comment #174 by N00B EATA Saturday, August 23, 2008 @ 02:35:57 PM ehh....who cares about achievements..play for fun! all that matters is that gears is comin out soon |
| Comment #175 by mrhobo Saturday, August 23, 2008 @ 03:48:30 PM wait wait wait, so people are willing to not buy this game for 1 little ole' achievement? WTF |
 | Comment #176 by Vince Saturday, August 23, 2008 @ 04:12:30 PM i like the idea of havin it! i thought the 1st seriously achievement drove people away from the multiplayer in the 1st gears! nobody wants to have to hear people complain for 8 straight rounds about how you stole their kill, they want the sniper, you a noob, o you have host advantage, the only reason you killed me is because your the host! online achievements = bullshit online community people become so obssessed with gettin the achievements they ruin the online experience! im willin to bet money epic looked at the overall achievements for everyone and saw that over half the people who bought the game didnt come close to unlocking all the online achievements! i dont mind people boostin cause at least they are orginazed in their efforts but the kids, pimple faced pre-teens, and immature ad |
| Comment #177 by Vince Saturday, August 23, 2008 @ 04:49:00 PM i was goin to say immature adults ruin the online experience for me |
 | Comment #178 by ztron500 Saturday, August 23, 2008 @ 05:01:11 PM I'm glad that their isn't a serious achievement for multiplayer in Gears 2 cus I hate hearing people on the XBL saying I got my achievement. |
| Comment #179 by Whiffy chedder Saturday, August 23, 2008 @ 06:43:37 PM It's all about ranked matches though, player sucks balls. Loads of sniper matches kicking you ect ect. If you hate the people in matches just mute them or dont put your mic in it's not hard really is it? Also It's only kids? so no adults are anoying? right. Anyone who has seriously legit will know what a great acievement it is. WHOO LETS PLAY HORDE MODE AND CAMPAIN!!100 times how boring. |
 | Comment #180 by xNightshadow99x Saturday, August 23, 2008 @ 07:20:25 PM Epic is doing the right thing b/c personally the Seriously acheivement is the only one I don't have in teh first gears and the reasons you have all stated are exactly why aswell as it's ecscruciatingly long and painful to play. So I'll definitely be picking this one up no matter what. |
 | Comment #181 by uegstevie Saturday, August 23, 2008 @ 07:38:56 PM thet said they might be takin out the host advantage wich iz well annoying on gears 1 cus they get no lagg atall!! |
 | Comment #182 by XxJesusNinjaxX Saturday, August 23, 2008 @ 07:46:24 PM holy shit this might take a while |
| Comment #183 by SpeedyWat Saturday, August 23, 2008 @ 08:00:39 PM Someone's gotta host... I hosted 35 games because they gave me my achievement early. The game is what it is, if you don't like it...don't play it. I got banned for a week because 4 people filed complaints on me for pistol whipping. Therefore, now and I'm here instead of gearsing it up. |
| Comment #184 by cool4joe Saturday, August 23, 2008 @ 10:56:08 PM @179 Just an FYI, if you have any friends on gears then you can't play with them in Ranked matches and they won't kick you from their player matches. |
 | Comment #185 by Piccolo549 Saturday, August 23, 2008 @ 11:05:54 PM read the update at xbox36fanboy(link at the top under the article)they made a mistake and multiplayer kills do count, ranked and social. |
| Comment #186 by FUSE 305 KTFO Sunday, August 24, 2008 @ 02:01:26 AM @184 wtf are you talking about??i play GOW ranked with my friends all the time......all you have to do is who ever hosting say the map name, number of rounds, and make the round duration other 2,4,or 5 so you wont get confused with a 3 minute room thats up...most people host 3 min matches....like i mostly play GOW with 7 rounds 2 min or 8 rounds 2 min...i never host...just did for my achievement and thats it.... |
| Comment #187 by FUSE 305 KTFO Sunday, August 24, 2008 @ 02:11:38 AM a lot of people on this shit sound like cry baby nuebs that dont know how to play GOW and all they play for is achievements... you buy GOW for multiplayer fuck a campaign...you play the campain 3-4 times and thats it....its all about MP!!! i got my seriously at 11,447 and i have about 35,000 kills now in execution and 20,000 in annex...all my kills and 1250 GP were all legit no boosting and no hosting(other than the 50 games just for the achievment).... just learn how to play the game and quit your bitching!!!! |
| Comment #188 by GrimReaper21093 Sunday, August 24, 2008 @ 02:39:04 AM omg fuse your such a badass lmao |
| Comment #189 by Fafner Sunday, August 24, 2008 @ 02:40:00 AM LOL wow, not buying a game because of achievments it sad enough, but for one.....wow, just wow. |
| Comment #190 by undyingone Sunday, August 24, 2008 @ 04:01:19 AM thank god for the update on this achievement i was kinda disappointed in this one untill now |
| Comment #191 by EliteHunter Sunday, August 24, 2008 @ 05:28:33 AM Seriously!! The achievements in the first GOW are really fucked up (no offense) especially the multiplayer ones. I think that the achievement is offline is a good thing, and how lots of others said it ``multiplayer is for fun, not for points``. I also heard that in the menu you will have an achievement progressive bar, so that u know when ur finished the achievement. |
 | Comment #192 by Xx NTAEndar xX Sunday, August 24, 2008 @ 07:42:42 AM FUSE 305 KTFO You're a funny kid boyo. I have done teh campaign 10 times, and am playing Insane solo for my 11th play=through. I have 11,000 kills, without Seriously... but I already knew that would liekly happen. I definitely wouldn't liek Gears of War as much without it's amazing campaign. I will probably do teh second installments campaign 20+ times within a few months. For kids who don't research, horde will give quick kills compared to most things. You fight hordes of locust constantly. That is many enemies. NICE!!!!!!!!!!!!!! Seriously 2.0 is going to pwn! |
 | Comment #193 by Ruthless Sunday, August 24, 2008 @ 11:12:53 AM Im not playing my 360 atm as i have a wii but i will try to play GoW 2 all the time and 1k the bastard but GoW was shit and glitched me so many achieves. |
| Comment #194 by Wednesday13 Sunday, August 24, 2008 @ 11:44:16 AM I agree with Force Clemson online achievements can be really #$^%$^!! anoying when you have little kids being complete @$%@#$! Oh well maybe soon they will just make achievements offline? |
 | Comment #195 by LordBunnyHunter Sunday, August 24, 2008 @ 03:27:44 PM Yep, #194 you're right. If I were a game designer, I would not give gamerscore for online rewardings, like CoD4. I hate online achievements for a couple of reasons. 1. Guys without LIVE cannot get them. 2. If you're playing with little kids, glitchers or cheaters it's not fun any more. 3. Half a year later you won't find anyone in the lobby so say goodbye to them. etc. |
 | Comment #196 by The Nick316 Sunday, August 24, 2008 @ 03:55:28 PM Fuse 305 is so god damn sexy. I want his Red Bull ridden body all over me. Yeah but seriously who cares ? End of the day the sniper is still going to be an overpowered broken weapon and there all still going to be loads of screaming kids on the mic because they got a headshot or some shit like that. The MP is fun but the gears community is a bunch of Ritalin deprived fucktards. |
 | Comment #197 by ShOcKsTa Sunday, August 24, 2008 @ 04:35:19 PM This is a good idea for the kills to count for every game mode... but ther will be little gays that will whore all over this in boosting matches. |
| Comment #198 by joshdude89 Sunday, August 24, 2008 @ 05:01:18 PM I agree with most people who have been saying that achievements should not be from online multiplayer only. Although, I do think that they could just give plenty of achievements that count from both single player and multiplayer, that way everybody could end up getting them no matter what type of game mode they prefer. Still, I think that they are on the right track. |
 | Comment #199 by Craigimuss Sunday, August 24, 2008 @ 07:26:58 PM Woooo something else to spend ages on. 100,000 is crazy. I got seriously on the first game but it ages. Getting them on campaign s cool but if you are playing it counting the kills ir may cheapen the experience. hopefully its gonna be really good. |
 | Comment #200 by TheWarriorElite Monday, August 25, 2008 @ 02:50:10 PM i agree with #23 i loved gears sp but didnt care much for mp |
| Comment #201 by BEVS ALMIGHTY Monday, September 01, 2008 @ 03:40:16 PM that sounds pretty hard and may take quite a while but i will enjoy givin it a go |
| Comment #202 by uegstevie Tuesday, September 02, 2008 @ 09:39:20 PM i like the sound of that cus in gears 1 if the kills from annex counted towards the seriously achievement then u would easily get the achievement but this 1 iz including the single player wich i get quite alot of kills of |
| Comment #203 by Orsen Monday, September 15, 2008 @ 02:21:06 PM I think Cliff noticed the whole, "10,000-20,000 kills and no seriously?" thing in Multiplayer. Though it did not happen to me I don't think he wants the risk of it happening again and disappointing more Gears fans. GEARS OF WAR 2 = 2 YEARS OF RIPPING PEOPLE IN HALF WITH MY SHOTTY! |
| Comment #204 by nemesis_ron Tuesday, September 30, 2008 @ 11:56:26 AM Seriously 2.0 - kill 20000 enemies. E.P.I.C? |
| Comment #205 by PZondaMuffin09 Monday, November 03, 2008 @ 03:10:02 PM Thats shit. who the fuck would bother to get this? please tell me that someone would do a seriously 2.0 glitch other wise no one will bother, well most people wont bother endlessly doing campian on the hardest diffeculy just to get 50G. Totally shit E.P.I.C. they must think that no-one these days has bloody frinds |
You need to register before being able to post comments on our news articles. |
Game Info
| Developed By: Epic Games Published By: Microsoft Genre: Shooter Release Date: US: November 07, 2008 Europe: November 07, 2008 Japan: |  | ||
Collection: | 4596 (Add to collection) | ||
| Wishlist: | 357 (Add to wishlist) | ||
Game Rating
93 | 84 | 0 |
| You need to log in or register to rate games. |
| User Score is based on 4126 user ratings. |
Screenshots
 |
My360Achievements
| You need to log in or register to use My360Achievements. |
Twitter
x360a Around The Web
Five Latest
|
Nov, 21 - Need For Speed: Shift
Nov, 19 - Resident Evil 5 Nov, 19 - Divinity 2: Ego Draconis Nov, 19 - No More Heroes: Heroes' Paradise Nov, 17 - Forza Motorsport 3 |
Poll
Sister Sites
Affiliates
